bars_groceries.3as6o3htr4mckskg0k4w4gwos.bxj7bs82axw0g448owg4gc8so.th

Just because there are more bars than grocery stores does not mean those are the places in the U.S. where people drink the most alcohol.

I generally try to stay away from drunks.  I don’t know. I guess I’m just too much of a control freak to want to let go,  to say nothing of not liking the morning-after feeling.  I think I’ve gotten drunk may twice in my life — and one time  was in too-high profile location to please me — and I never wanted to do that again.

The whole escapist drinking thing has never made much sense to me, but as long as you can buy beer for less than soda I doubt that anyone’s gonna stop drinking.  (Not that I expect anyone to do so — I like a drink too ya know.)

I’ve always thought it funny that us Northerners have a tendency to look at what used to be called “Rednecks” as if they were the higher alcohol consumers — whereas in many cases we might be outdoing those we look down our noses at.

I had no real point in posting these two diagrams other than to illustrate that common myths are often just that:  MYTHS.

Where the  number of bars outnumber grocery stores

 

is not where people drink the most.

 

The Love of Debate

“The French love of debate and their belief that people should be actively engaged in ideas and issues means that they expect others not to shy away from expressing and defending their opinions. French business people expect others to disagree and argue with them.” from the book, Doing Business Internationally

I remember once in the Loire I was trying to purchase a ticket for a museum. The clerk began to argue with me that there was only 25 minutes left until closing and I couldn’t possible see anything so there was no reason to purchase a ticket, despite the fact that the museum was open and she could sell a ticket to me. We argued back and forth pretty intensely for five minutes – me saying I could see enough and that it was my money to spend and she arguing what a waste of money and experience it would be.

But then came that moment – the moment that all french arguments have – where we just stopped. She sold me my ticket and, in a sincere, pleasant way, told me to enjoy myself. And I thanked her and wished her a good night. There was no lingering affect on either us from the fierce disagreement we just had.

There has been many times I’ve sat at a dinner table with french friends and argued passionately about something – politics, philosophy, why someone wears blue or the necessity of cats. It can often get intense but just as quickly as a debate comes on, with a sip of wine, everyone is back to being friends and agreeable because the point of discussion is not always to persuade or win but just to experience and enjoy the passion of debate.

Perhaps it’s because I’m half french that I find the interesting and irrelevant – perhaps especially irrelevant – debates the best and often the most crucial to an enjoyably lived life.

Reposted from All About Alex

 

How do you control wood chips?  It seems the City of Cudahy is having a hard time figuring it out.

The school next door has a wonderful modern playground, with plastic, kid-friendly apparatus and a solid layer of wood chip cushioning.  The whole apparatus area is surrounded by a ring of sunken telephones (sunken lengthwise 1/2 the diameter of the poles) The installation been there some time unchanged, but every year the school board has to bring in more wood chips.

The disappearing chips happen partly because the drainage on the playground causes a lot of the chips to float out of the apparatus area. And of course kids always kick and throw some of the chips as a mere function playing.  Not only do the chips disappear from where they are needed, they also leave a trail of their wandering along the flowage pathway where they present a tripping danger.

This past summer the school board came with what look like 8″ x 8″ timbers.  They laid them lengthwise on top of the lengthwise sunken telephone poles, drilled holes in the timbers and inserted rebar to fasten them. Continue reading »

 

The urge to copy has always bothered me.  Initially, not from the standpoint of artistic plagiarism — because in the beginning I wasn’t thinking about art.  I grew up in post-WWII america and Japan was just rebuilding.  I remember copying-examples given in school where Japanese products had so completely copied U.S. products that even things like mould flash were duplicated when the part was produced using an alternative process — effectively duplicating a “defect.”

As I got older I began to notice how copying was not just a Japanese trait, that us Americans were just as good at copying, we just do it in different ways and call it capitalism.  I guess the first time I noticed our penchant for imitation when there started being quick oil change franchises on every street corner.  It started with a single company, and soon there were half a dozen national franchises.  And Fast Food franchises.  And Big Box discount houses. There were other smaller examples too, in fashion, in electronics, etc..

Then I noticed food dishes — restaurants started serving pasta with “alfredo sauce” when the origin of alfredo wasn’t a “sauce” it was part of the preparation and wasn’t a sauce at all.  But alfredo wasn’t the only food name that was borrowed by a food retailer who wanted to cash in on a profit opportunity without putting the quality, cost, and work into the dish.  It was easier to fabricate an imitation and call it by the original name than to employ real chefs to create the product in the traditional way.

Then I noticed architectural copying.  Even when I was young I didn’t understand why people put porches on their Victorian homes that didn’t fit the design of the home.  Rather than spend money on original craftsmanship it was easier and cheaper to bastardize the appearance with a cheaper replacement.  Then I started noticing small columns on the front of tract homes attempting to make a Northern home look something like a old Southern mansion;  and imitating all sorts of other construction processess so that inexpensive homes looked like something much more expensive, or so that American homes looked like something from another country.

It bothered me that Europeans seemed to have several styles that identified with the country but that Americans seemed determined to be someone or something other than we are.

Well, I take back all my wondering and my pondering.  I now accept copying as simply a part of human nature.

Why?

Because of China.  “Because of China,” you say?  Yes.

It seems China has begun replicating ENTIRE WESTERN TOWNS.  This CNN article covers the topic quite nicely.

Some other day I’ll talk about artistic copying, but that’s it for today.

 

 

I’m really not political. I’m an artist;  I don’t think very much about government, and I don’t think very much about business.  But I do stay abreast of world news.  While my art keeps me busy most of the time, the local news also breaks through my shell on occasion.  Lately, I’ve been reminded just WHY I am not particularly political.

We Americans are so short-sighted!  And that includes Wisconsinites.  We have lived lives of luxury compared to the rest of the world and yet as a people we seem never to be satisfied with what we have.

Provincialism is “being narrow in scope, or considering only small sections of an issue.” Provincialism has been the hallmark of Wisconsin politics since the middle of February (2011).  On the surface it has been an argument about collective bargaining for public workers.  But the collective bargaining issue is such a small part of the overall issue that it’s maddening that NO one is talking about the larger issues.

For decades we have been spending more money than we make.  Nationally, Statewide, and individuals have been doing it as well.  At some point in time we have to pay the piper.  At some point we have to realize that some of the promises we have made to people cannot be fulfilled.  It’s a bitter fact.  And certainly there is not a politician around who wants to bear that bad news to the electorate — but at some point in time the electorate will be forced to realize that we (collectively) have spent ourselves into national bankruptcy.

40% of our national budget we borrow from someone else.

National mandates require states to pour buckets of money into programs the states never asked for — and the result is that money once available for wages, benefits, maintenance, etc., is being spent to provide other (perhaps) wonderful services, but services that no one has bothered  to factor into the equation of how much can we afford.

For decades I have watched as the nature of politics has changed.  We have become increasingly polarized, we have become increasingly less willing to LISTEN to other points of view; we have decided that talking louder, or behaving badly will get us what we want.  We are already paying the penalty — Government overpays for almost all services it provides.  Because we are throwing money away in some places we do not have it to pay for other things that also need doing.  Citizens with legitimate needs are left wanting; antagonism rises, polarity increases and we are on a merry-go-round that never ends.

And in the bargain we have professional politicians who want to keep their jobs more than they want to do what is necessary for those they serve.  What they really want, is to be re-elected — at whatever cost.

It’s sad that a great republic has been reduced to this.

In time the noise about the the 2011 budget will go away.  I doubt that the depths of our budget shortfall will have been addressed.  As I write this the Federal government is trying to avoid a national government shutdown.  I doubt that the national debt crisis will be fixed this year either.

And I really wonder, will we act before this nation too disintegrates in revolution…. No one thought it would happen with the U.S.S.R. or East Germany — but it did.  And revolution continues to change international political geography.  This year Egypt, Libya and who knows what other country….. How long before our debt payments to other nations drives citizens here to similar behavior.

The problem with history is that no one thinks that THEY will be the ones to repeat it.

© 2011 I Shoot People Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha